https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206400 Delay of 101 days in filing the appeal was condoned on the explanation that the appellants believed the activity was exempted and, being illiterate, did not understand the need for immediate challenge. The appeal had earlier been dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction requiring payment of Rs. 60,000, and the matter was restored with time granted for compliance. After deposit is made and reported to the appellate authority, the appeal is to be heard and decided on merits. en-us Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206400 Delay of 101 days in filing the appeal was condoned on the explanation that the appellants believed the activity was exempted and, being illiterate, did not understand the need for immediate challenge. The appeal had earlier been dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit direction requiring payment of Rs. 60,000, and the matter was restored with time granted for compliance. After deposit is made and reported to the appellate authority, the appeal is to be heard and decided on merits. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206400