https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206398 The court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of respondent No. 1. It held that the names of the companies did not too nearly resemble each other and that the Regional Director's order was valid despite being issued beyond the statutory period, considering the court's prior directions. The petition was dismissed on merits, with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206398 The court dismissed the petition, ruling in favor of respondent No. 1. It held that the names of the companies did not too nearly resemble each other and that the Regional Director's order was valid despite being issued beyond the statutory period, considering the court's prior directions. The petition was dismissed on merits, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206398