https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206389 An export promotion body incorporated as a company may still be amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where it performs public functions, implements export policy, and controls access to export entitlements. The availability of a Companies Act remedy before the Company Law Board does not bar writ relief where the challenge is to the validity of the membership regulations themselves and the statutory remedy is inadequate. Regulations creating separate classes of registered exporters and member exporters were found inconsistent with the Export and Import Policy and unconstitutional because they imposed an additional eligibility threshold, excluded registered exporters from voting and membership, and lacked a rational nexus with the policy objective of democratised membership and elections. en-us Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206389 An export promotion body incorporated as a company may still be amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where it performs public functions, implements export policy, and controls access to export entitlements. The availability of a Companies Act remedy before the Company Law Board does not bar writ relief where the challenge is to the validity of the membership regulations themselves and the statutory remedy is inadequate. Regulations creating separate classes of registered exporters and member exporters were found inconsistent with the Export and Import Policy and unconstitutional because they imposed an additional eligibility threshold, excluded registered exporters from voting and membership, and lacked a rational nexus with the policy objective of democratised membership and elections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206389