<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 260 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 140.400 MTs of rice valued at Rs.78,31,564/-Lakhs and a penalty of Rs.50,000/- imposed on the appellant for attempting to export non-Basmati rice as Basmati rice. The decision was based on the deliberate violation of quality standards and regulatory prohibitions, deeming the confiscation and penalty justified due to the significant value involved. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 260 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of 140.400 MTs of rice valued at Rs.78,31,564/-Lakhs and a penalty of Rs.50,000/- imposed on the appellant for attempting to export non-Basmati rice as Basmati rice. The decision was based on the deliberate violation of quality standards and regulatory prohibitions, deeming the confiscation and penalty justified due to the significant value involved. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>