<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 399 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206371</link>
    <description>The scope of capital goods under Rule 57Q was construed liberally for Modvat credit. Crane with accessories and loader were treated as machinery and equipment used in the manufacturing process and therefore fell within the rule. The steel items and cement were accepted on the factual finding that they were used for construction of the plant and other components necessary to establish the manufacturing unit, with the user test supporting inclusion where the items were integrally connected to the manufacturing apparatus. The items were held to be capital goods eligible for credit, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 399 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206371</link>
      <description>The scope of capital goods under Rule 57Q was construed liberally for Modvat credit. Crane with accessories and loader were treated as machinery and equipment used in the manufacturing process and therefore fell within the rule. The steel items and cement were accepted on the factual finding that they were used for construction of the plant and other components necessary to establish the manufacturing unit, with the user test supporting inclusion where the items were integrally connected to the manufacturing apparatus. The items were held to be capital goods eligible for credit, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>