<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 398 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206370</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that cenvat credit on freight outward basis amounting to Rs.3,61,761/- wrongly availed by the assessee during January 2005 to December 2007 was admissible. The Tribunal held that the amendment by Notification No.10/2008-CE-NT was not clarificatory and cited the decision of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Karnataka in a similar case. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the precedence set by the High Court and the clarity provided in the latest judgment regarding the admissibility of the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 398 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206370</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that cenvat credit on freight outward basis amounting to Rs.3,61,761/- wrongly availed by the assessee during January 2005 to December 2007 was admissible. The Tribunal held that the amendment by Notification No.10/2008-CE-NT was not clarificatory and cited the decision of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Karnataka in a similar case. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the precedence set by the High Court and the clarity provided in the latest judgment regarding the admissibility of the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>