<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 101 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206364</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the orders of both the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, directing the Assessing Officer to treat the interest paid as business expenditure, subject to Section 14A of the Act. The Court emphasized the importance of considering the assessee&#039;s money lending business and previous assessments, concluding that the Tribunal erred in disregarding these factors. The appeal was allowed, and the outcome favored the assessee, requiring reassessment of the interest expenditure within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 101 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206364</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the orders of both the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, directing the Assessing Officer to treat the interest paid as business expenditure, subject to Section 14A of the Act. The Court emphasized the importance of considering the assessee&#039;s money lending business and previous assessments, concluding that the Tribunal erred in disregarding these factors. The appeal was allowed, and the outcome favored the assessee, requiring reassessment of the interest expenditure within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>