<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 527 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside penalties imposed under Sections 77 &amp;amp; 78, citing doubts raised by a Board Circular regarding taxability of services provided by the respondents. The Tribunal found the respondents&#039; non-payment of tax during the relevant period justified due to uncertainty in the field, deeming the penalties unwarranted. The department&#039;s appeal for penalty restoration was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 527 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside penalties imposed under Sections 77 &amp;amp; 78, citing doubts raised by a Board Circular regarding taxability of services provided by the respondents. The Tribunal found the respondents&#039; non-payment of tax during the relevant period justified due to uncertainty in the field, deeming the penalties unwarranted. The department&#039;s appeal for penalty restoration was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>