<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 526 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206340</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, rejecting the department&#039;s appeal. It was held that no new product emerged from the process of converting hydrogenated castor oil into powder form, as the chemical composition and characteristics remained unchanged. The judgment emphasized the requirement for a distinct name, character, and use for an activity to constitute &quot;manufacture,&quot; citing relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 526 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206340</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, rejecting the department&#039;s appeal. It was held that no new product emerged from the process of converting hydrogenated castor oil into powder form, as the chemical composition and characteristics remained unchanged. The judgment emphasized the requirement for a distinct name, character, and use for an activity to constitute &quot;manufacture,&quot; citing relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>