<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 792 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206338</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on inputs sourced from a 100% EOU is confined to the additional duty leviable on like goods under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Goods cleared by a 100% EOU into the Domestic Tariff Area remain subject to excise duty under Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, even though the duty is computed with reference to customs duties; Notification No. 2/95-C.E. affects only the extent of exemption. On a conjoint reading of the rules and notification, the relevant test is the additional duty actually payable on the inputs, not the EOU&#039;s own duty computation, and the credit allowed to the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 792 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206338</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on inputs sourced from a 100% EOU is confined to the additional duty leviable on like goods under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Goods cleared by a 100% EOU into the Domestic Tariff Area remain subject to excise duty under Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, even though the duty is computed with reference to customs duties; Notification No. 2/95-C.E. affects only the extent of exemption. On a conjoint reading of the rules and notification, the relevant test is the additional duty actually payable on the inputs, not the EOU&#039;s own duty computation, and the credit allowed to the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>