<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 7 - Allahabad High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206334</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning the interpretation of Section 48 of the Income Tax Act for long term capital gains. The Court ruled that the capital gain should be calculated based on the payment schedule, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for full benefit of price indexation with reference to the date of payment. Additionally, the Court determined that the cost of acquisition should be based on the actual amounts paid after the allotment letter, emphasizing the exhaustive definition in Section 55(2) without introducing additional meanings. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 7 - Allahabad High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206334</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning the interpretation of Section 48 of the Income Tax Act for long term capital gains. The Court ruled that the capital gain should be calculated based on the payment schedule, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for full benefit of price indexation with reference to the date of payment. Additionally, the Court determined that the cost of acquisition should be based on the actual amounts paid after the allotment letter, emphasizing the exhaustive definition in Section 55(2) without introducing additional meanings. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>