<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 578 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206329</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s and the Assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications. The Revenue&#039;s application was rejected as the Assessee provided adequate evidence for the claim, verified by the Assessing Officer. The Assessee&#039;s application was not pressed as the issue was acknowledged by the High Court. The Tribunal upheld that there was no error in the original order and confirmed the Assessee&#039;s compliance with Section 72A provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 578 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206329</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue&#039;s and the Assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Applications. The Revenue&#039;s application was rejected as the Assessee provided adequate evidence for the claim, verified by the Assessing Officer. The Assessee&#039;s application was not pressed as the issue was acknowledged by the High Court. The Tribunal upheld that there was no error in the original order and confirmed the Assessee&#039;s compliance with Section 72A provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>