<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 614 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206326</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 but dismissed the appeal for 2004-05. It upheld the deduction u/s 10A for all years. The issue of bad debts written off was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination and quantification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 614 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206326</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 but dismissed the appeal for 2004-05. It upheld the deduction u/s 10A for all years. The issue of bad debts written off was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination and quantification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>