<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 715 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206312</link>
    <description>Corrugated boxes cleared to merchant-exporters for packing export goods were treated as export clearances, not clearances for home consumption, for SSI exemption purposes. The Tribunal applied earlier decisions and accepted that the Board&#039;s simplified proof of export procedure, including Form-H or equivalent sales tax documents, governed these transactions. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the absence of direct export from the assessee&#039;s factory changed the character of the clearances, noting that the goods were ultimately exported through the merchant-exporter route. The later Supreme Court decision was held not to displace the earlier Tribunal view on these facts, and the duty demand and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 715 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206312</link>
      <description>Corrugated boxes cleared to merchant-exporters for packing export goods were treated as export clearances, not clearances for home consumption, for SSI exemption purposes. The Tribunal applied earlier decisions and accepted that the Board&#039;s simplified proof of export procedure, including Form-H or equivalent sales tax documents, governed these transactions. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the absence of direct export from the assessee&#039;s factory changed the character of the clearances, noting that the goods were ultimately exported through the merchant-exporter route. The later Supreme Court decision was held not to displace the earlier Tribunal view on these facts, and the duty demand and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>