<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 380 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 80-IB on income earned from job work charges, excluding repairs and maintenance. Income from repairs and maintenance cannot be equated with manufacturing income for the purpose of the deduction. Due to the destruction of records in a fire incident, 50% of the job work charges were considered eligible for the deduction, while the remaining 50% attributed to repairs and maintenance was not qualified. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 380 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 80-IB on income earned from job work charges, excluding repairs and maintenance. Income from repairs and maintenance cannot be equated with manufacturing income for the purpose of the deduction. Due to the destruction of records in a fire incident, 50% of the job work charges were considered eligible for the deduction, while the remaining 50% attributed to repairs and maintenance was not qualified. The revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>