<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 370 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the income from the PDPL project should be taxed as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) at 10% under section 115A, not as business income at 40%. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to apply the relevant provisions accordingly. Other issues such as Permanent Establishment (PE), expenditure deduction, and interest were considered academic or consequential and were not separately addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 370 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the income from the PDPL project should be taxed as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) at 10% under section 115A, not as business income at 40%. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to apply the relevant provisions accordingly. Other issues such as Permanent Establishment (PE), expenditure deduction, and interest were considered academic or consequential and were not separately addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>