<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 351 - Authority for Advance Ruling</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206282</link>
    <description>Routine data-processing services, including sorting, reviewing, scanning, batching and transmitting data, were analysed as non-technical support work rather than managerial, technical or consultancy services. Under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA and section 9(1)(vii), fees for technical services arise only where technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes are made available to the recipient; on these facts, no such making available occurred, so the consideration was not taxable as technical services income. Because the payment was not chargeable to tax in India, the withholding obligation under section 195 also did not arise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 351 - Authority for Advance Ruling</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206282</link>
      <description>Routine data-processing services, including sorting, reviewing, scanning, batching and transmitting data, were analysed as non-technical support work rather than managerial, technical or consultancy services. Under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA and section 9(1)(vii), fees for technical services arise only where technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes are made available to the recipient; on these facts, no such making available occurred, so the consideration was not taxable as technical services income. Because the payment was not chargeable to tax in India, the withholding obligation under section 195 also did not arise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>