https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206273 The Tribunal, led by Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the respondents' eligibility for CENVAT Credit on courier services and CHA services. The Tribunal relied on precedent decisions supporting the admissibility of credit for these services, emphasizing that the Revenue's arguments lacked merit. Additionally, the Tribunal held that decisions regarding CHA and courier services were covered by precedent decisions, rendering the Revenue's appeal against a Larger Bench decision irrelevant. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue's interpretation of an amendment, citing a High Court decision allowing credit for business activities beyond the place of removal. en-us Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206273 The Tribunal, led by Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the respondents' eligibility for CENVAT Credit on courier services and CHA services. The Tribunal relied on precedent decisions supporting the admissibility of credit for these services, emphasizing that the Revenue's arguments lacked merit. Additionally, the Tribunal held that decisions regarding CHA and courier services were covered by precedent decisions, rendering the Revenue's appeal against a Larger Bench decision irrelevant. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue's interpretation of an amendment, citing a High Court decision allowing credit for business activities beyond the place of removal. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206273