<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 677 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206269</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for re-consideration regarding the refund of excess service tax paid without utilizing abatement. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evaluating the case based on the Chartered Accountant certificate and balance sheet provided by the assessee, highlighting the need for a fair opportunity and adherence to principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the stay petition also being disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 677 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206269</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remitted the matter back to the adjudicating authority for re-consideration regarding the refund of excess service tax paid without utilizing abatement. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evaluating the case based on the Chartered Accountant certificate and balance sheet provided by the assessee, highlighting the need for a fair opportunity and adherence to principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the stay petition also being disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>