https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206266 The court quashed the detention memo, seizure order, and confiscation order, allowing the petition similar to the Division Bench judgment in the case of M/s. Abhaas Spinners Private Limited. The court found the extension order was not communicated within the required time, rendering the detention and seizure invalid. The court held that the opportunity for representation under Section 124(c) was illusory as the order was premature. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Aug 2012 18:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206266 The court quashed the detention memo, seizure order, and confiscation order, allowing the petition similar to the Division Bench judgment in the case of M/s. Abhaas Spinners Private Limited. The court found the extension order was not communicated within the required time, rendering the detention and seizure invalid. The court held that the opportunity for representation under Section 124(c) was illusory as the order was premature. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206266