<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 675 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the order directing the Commissioner to return the pre-deposit amount to the respondent with interest, adjusting the rate to 6% p.a. as per Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument to calculate interest from a specific date and upheld that Section 35FF does not apply retroactively. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and clarified the applicable interest rate for such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 675 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the order directing the Commissioner to return the pre-deposit amount to the respondent with interest, adjusting the rate to 6% p.a. as per Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument to calculate interest from a specific date and upheld that Section 35FF does not apply retroactively. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and clarified the applicable interest rate for such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>