<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 356 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for CENVAT Credit with interest but set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant due to the prompt payment of the disputed amount and the absence of suppression or fraud in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 356 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for CENVAT Credit with interest but set aside the penalties imposed on the appellant due to the prompt payment of the disputed amount and the absence of suppression or fraud in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>