<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 670 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206247</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding a refund claim on unjust enrichment under business auxiliary services. The Tribunal found that the duty burden was not passed on to customers, as evidenced by credit notes issued by the respondent and supporting documents confirming non-receipt of service tax from customers. The contract price was inclusive of all taxes, and the excess service tax shown separately in the invoice was not collected from customers. The Tribunal concluded that the refund was not barred by unjust enrichment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 670 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206247</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding a refund claim on unjust enrichment under business auxiliary services. The Tribunal found that the duty burden was not passed on to customers, as evidenced by credit notes issued by the respondent and supporting documents confirming non-receipt of service tax from customers. The contract price was inclusive of all taxes, and the excess service tax shown separately in the invoice was not collected from customers. The Tribunal concluded that the refund was not barred by unjust enrichment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>