https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206244 A writ petition against provisional anti-dumping duty was treated as maintainable to the limited extent of testing the legality of the provisional levy and the investigation process, because the proceedings before the designated authority were quasi-judicial and no appeal lay at that stage. The Court also held that confidentiality under the anti-dumping rules protects supplied information, not the essential basis of preliminary findings. By blanking out the figures and reasoning on normal value, export price, dumping margin and injury, the authority denied an effective opportunity to object, so the provisional duty founded on those findings could not be enforced. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206244 A writ petition against provisional anti-dumping duty was treated as maintainable to the limited extent of testing the legality of the provisional levy and the investigation process, because the proceedings before the designated authority were quasi-judicial and no appeal lay at that stage. The Court also held that confidentiality under the anti-dumping rules protects supplied information, not the essential basis of preliminary findings. By blanking out the figures and reasoning on normal value, export price, dumping margin and injury, the authority denied an effective opportunity to object, so the provisional duty founded on those findings could not be enforced. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206244