<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 342 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206203</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal confirmed the Service Tax liability of Rs.55,286 against the appellant for mobile services promotion. The tribunal upheld the Service Tax confirmation but reduced the penalty under Section 78, set aside penalties under Sections 76, and upheld the penalty under Section 77. The appellant was given the option to pay a reduced penalty amount within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 342 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206203</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal confirmed the Service Tax liability of Rs.55,286 against the appellant for mobile services promotion. The tribunal upheld the Service Tax confirmation but reduced the penalty under Section 78, set aside penalties under Sections 76, and upheld the penalty under Section 77. The appellant was given the option to pay a reduced penalty amount within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>