<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 474 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and granted a stay against the recovery of the disallowed CENVAT credit with interest during the appeal process. The issue revolved around the early availment of CENVAT credit based on computer entries rather than physical invoice receipts. Despite discrepancies in timing, the Tribunal recognized the correct payment and distribution of service tax, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants due to the absence of penalties and the possibility of interest imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 474 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement and granted a stay against the recovery of the disallowed CENVAT credit with interest during the appeal process. The issue revolved around the early availment of CENVAT credit based on computer entries rather than physical invoice receipts. Despite discrepancies in timing, the Tribunal recognized the correct payment and distribution of service tax, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants due to the absence of penalties and the possibility of interest imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>