<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 255 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206198</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication, instructing the original authority to reconsider the matter in line with the law and granting the appellant a fair opportunity. This decision aligns with the interpretation of Section 27 and ensures that the appellant&#039;s right to a refund claim is upheld, even without challenging the assessment directly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 255 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206198</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication, instructing the original authority to reconsider the matter in line with the law and granting the appellant a fair opportunity. This decision aligns with the interpretation of Section 27 and ensures that the appellant&#039;s right to a refund claim is upheld, even without challenging the assessment directly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>