<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 744 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reassessment of the applicability of Sl. No. 267 of Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. for the period 1-3-2003 to 28-2-2006 and reconsideration of the limitation issue. Penalties and demands for the period 1-3-2006 to 31-1-2007 were overturned based on classification precedent. The penalty on the Managing Director was also sent back for review. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a comprehensive review of evidence and fair hearing for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 744 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reassessment of the applicability of Sl. No. 267 of Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. for the period 1-3-2003 to 28-2-2006 and reconsideration of the limitation issue. Penalties and demands for the period 1-3-2006 to 31-1-2007 were overturned based on classification precedent. The penalty on the Managing Director was also sent back for review. The Tribunal stressed the importance of a comprehensive review of evidence and fair hearing for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>