<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 337 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206181</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a telecommunication equipment manufacturer, in a case concerning the liability to pay service tax on technical know-how fees categorized as consulting engineers&#039; services. The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority, citing legal interpretations that favored the appellant&#039;s position. It held that the service recipient in India was not liable to pay service tax for services received from abroad before a specific legislative amendment date, as established by relevant legal precedents, including decisions from the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court. The appellant was granted relief, emphasizing adherence to established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 337 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206181</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a telecommunication equipment manufacturer, in a case concerning the liability to pay service tax on technical know-how fees categorized as consulting engineers&#039; services. The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority, citing legal interpretations that favored the appellant&#039;s position. It held that the service recipient in India was not liable to pay service tax for services received from abroad before a specific legislative amendment date, as established by relevant legal precedents, including decisions from the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court. The appellant was granted relief, emphasizing adherence to established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>