<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 609 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206177</link>
    <description>The court set aside and quashed the demand-cum-show cause notice issued under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, as it was deemed premature without a final assessment. The petitioners&#039; challenge to the notice was upheld, emphasizing that responding to the notice did not prevent them from contesting its validity. The court highlighted the necessity of completing final assessment before imposing confiscation, penalty, or interest, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioners and disposing of the writ application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 609 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206177</link>
      <description>The court set aside and quashed the demand-cum-show cause notice issued under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, as it was deemed premature without a final assessment. The petitioners&#039; challenge to the notice was upheld, emphasizing that responding to the notice did not prevent them from contesting its validity. The court highlighted the necessity of completing final assessment before imposing confiscation, penalty, or interest, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioners and disposing of the writ application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>