<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 546 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206162</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the service tax demand and penalties imposed on the appellant in a case concerning the classification of activities under &quot;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service.&quot; It was determined that the appellant&#039;s activities fell under this service category, and the contracts were deemed to have distinct taxable service components. The extended limitation period was deemed applicable due to the suppression of facts, and penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 were upheld for non-compliance with service tax provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 546 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206162</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the service tax demand and penalties imposed on the appellant in a case concerning the classification of activities under &quot;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Service.&quot; It was determined that the appellant&#039;s activities fell under this service category, and the contracts were deemed to have distinct taxable service components. The extended limitation period was deemed applicable due to the suppression of facts, and penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 were upheld for non-compliance with service tax provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>