<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 336 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty against the appellant due to fake invoices, remanding the case for fresh decision. Revenue partially recovered duty, leading to waiver of pre-deposit for balance amount and penalty. The matter was remanded to original adjudicating authority, considering previous case law. Revenue&#039;s challenge on penalty reduction and deletion for Director was also remanded for reconsideration, ensuring all penalty aspects are reviewed afresh by the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 336 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty against the appellant due to fake invoices, remanding the case for fresh decision. Revenue partially recovered duty, leading to waiver of pre-deposit for balance amount and penalty. The matter was remanded to original adjudicating authority, considering previous case law. Revenue&#039;s challenge on penalty reduction and deletion for Director was also remanded for reconsideration, ensuring all penalty aspects are reviewed afresh by the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>