<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 668 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206148</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, while the appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring that legal principles and precedents were appropriately applied. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act was upheld, disallowance under section 14A was remanded for fresh determination, adhoc disallowance of 10% on various expenses was deleted, disallowance of 1/10th on motor car and telephone expenses was not pressed, deletion of addition on account of commission was upheld, and deletion of addition on account of loan processing fee was also upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 668 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206148</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, while the appeal filed by the Assessing Officer was dismissed. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring that legal principles and precedents were appropriately applied. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act was upheld, disallowance under section 14A was remanded for fresh determination, adhoc disallowance of 10% on various expenses was deleted, disallowance of 1/10th on motor car and telephone expenses was not pressed, deletion of addition on account of commission was upheld, and deletion of addition on account of loan processing fee was also upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>