<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 654 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206143</link>
    <description>Non-registration by a service provider not liable to pay service tax was held not to defeat a refund claim for unutilised input service tax credit used in export of services. Registration under the governing rule was treated as a procedural requirement applicable to assessees liable to pay service tax, not as a substantive for refund where the claimant sought only reimbursement of accumulated credit. As the refund period predated registration and the entity was otherwise outside the tax-liability net, non-registration could not be used to deny the refund. The refund order was therefore maintained and the appeal rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 654 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206143</link>
      <description>Non-registration by a service provider not liable to pay service tax was held not to defeat a refund claim for unutilised input service tax credit used in export of services. Registration under the governing rule was treated as a procedural requirement applicable to assessees liable to pay service tax, not as a substantive for refund where the claimant sought only reimbursement of accumulated credit. As the refund period predated registration and the entity was otherwise outside the tax-liability net, non-registration could not be used to deny the refund. The refund order was therefore maintained and the appeal rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>