<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 289 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206138</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting cenvat credit on inputs and capital goods for goods manufactured on job work basis, despite the Revenue&#039;s argument post-amendment of Notification No.214/86 by Notification No.20/2003-CE. The decision aligned with precedent rulings emphasizing duty payment on final products and cenvat credit availability, overturning the demand of Rs.1,24,663/- imposed by the original adjudicating authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 289 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206138</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting cenvat credit on inputs and capital goods for goods manufactured on job work basis, despite the Revenue&#039;s argument post-amendment of Notification No.214/86 by Notification No.20/2003-CE. The decision aligned with precedent rulings emphasizing duty payment on final products and cenvat credit availability, overturning the demand of Rs.1,24,663/- imposed by the original adjudicating authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>