<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 466 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206124</link>
    <description>Seized private records, including kachcha challans, hisaba books and loose sheets, may support allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal where linked to the assessee and corroborated by transport, railway, consignee or stock evidence. Voluntary inculpatory statements recorded under the Central Excise Act retain evidentiary value unless retractions substantiate coercion or inducement. Excise adjudication applies the preponderance-of-probabilities standard; once private records and admissions establish a prima facie case, the assessee must rebut their connection with unaccounted clearances. Interest and mandatory penalty apply only to clearances made after the provisions entered into force, requiring corresponding recalculation. Confiscation and proportionate penalties may follow established clandestine removals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 466 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206124</link>
      <description>Seized private records, including kachcha challans, hisaba books and loose sheets, may support allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal where linked to the assessee and corroborated by transport, railway, consignee or stock evidence. Voluntary inculpatory statements recorded under the Central Excise Act retain evidentiary value unless retractions substantiate coercion or inducement. Excise adjudication applies the preponderance-of-probabilities standard; once private records and admissions establish a prima facie case, the assessee must rebut their connection with unaccounted clearances. Interest and mandatory penalty apply only to clearances made after the provisions entered into force, requiring corresponding recalculation. Confiscation and proportionate penalties may follow established clandestine removals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>