<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 325 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206101</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, affirming that the property held by the appellant, HUF, was an investment and not a business asset. The court found that the property was not treated as stock in trade, and its character of holding remained as an investment even after the dissolution of the partnership.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 325 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206101</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax case appeal, affirming that the property held by the appellant, HUF, was an investment and not a business asset. The court found that the property was not treated as stock in trade, and its character of holding remained as an investment even after the dissolution of the partnership.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>