<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 463 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206099</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the disputed items, including labor charges and miscellaneous income, could not be decided under Section 154 rectification proceedings for deduction under Section 80HH. The Assessing Officer&#039;s revision was considered a change of opinion, not rectification, and lacked authority to modify deductions. The revised assessment order was found to violate previous decisions, and the appellate authority&#039;s decision in favor of the deductions was upheld. The court emphasized that Section 154 rectification is for correcting clear mistakes, not debatable legal points, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 463 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206099</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the disputed items, including labor charges and miscellaneous income, could not be decided under Section 154 rectification proceedings for deduction under Section 80HH. The Assessing Officer&#039;s revision was considered a change of opinion, not rectification, and lacked authority to modify deductions. The revised assessment order was found to violate previous decisions, and the appellate authority&#039;s decision in favor of the deductions was upheld. The court emphasized that Section 154 rectification is for correcting clear mistakes, not debatable legal points, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>