<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 528 - CESTAT, CHENNAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206087</link>
    <description>The Finance Act, 1994 defines &quot;port service&quot; as a self-contained taxing entry, so only the statutory meanings of &quot;port&quot; and &quot;other port&quot; were borrowed from the port laws and no wider importation of their administrative provisions was permitted. Stevedoring carried on under port authorisation was held to be port service because it was rendered in relation to vessels and goods. Inter-carting, storage of cargo, blending of coal, and similar within-port cargo-handling operations were also treated as ancillary to stevedoring and within the broad phrase &quot;in any manner&quot; in relation to goods. The reference was answered accordingly and the appeals were remitted for disposal on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 528 - CESTAT, CHENNAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206087</link>
      <description>The Finance Act, 1994 defines &quot;port service&quot; as a self-contained taxing entry, so only the statutory meanings of &quot;port&quot; and &quot;other port&quot; were borrowed from the port laws and no wider importation of their administrative provisions was permitted. Stevedoring carried on under port authorisation was held to be port service because it was rendered in relation to vessels and goods. Inter-carting, storage of cargo, blending of coal, and similar within-port cargo-handling operations were also treated as ancillary to stevedoring and within the broad phrase &quot;in any manner&quot; in relation to goods. The reference was answered accordingly and the appeals were remitted for disposal on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>