<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 485 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206085</link>
    <description>The case involved the enhancement of the declared value of imported Polyester Chips Semi Dull Three Gun Brand No.SP-1912. Despite the importer&#039;s submissions and evidence, the value was increased to US $1035 per MT. The appellate authority considered contemporaneous imports and ultimately determined the assessable value at US $885 per MT. The Revenue&#039;s justification for enhancement based on another bill of entry was deemed insufficient by the tribunal, leading to the rejection of their appeal. This case emphasizes the importance of substantiating declared values and the need for concrete evidence in customs valuation disputes to balance the interests of both the Revenue and importers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 485 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206085</link>
      <description>The case involved the enhancement of the declared value of imported Polyester Chips Semi Dull Three Gun Brand No.SP-1912. Despite the importer&#039;s submissions and evidence, the value was increased to US $1035 per MT. The appellate authority considered contemporaneous imports and ultimately determined the assessable value at US $885 per MT. The Revenue&#039;s justification for enhancement based on another bill of entry was deemed insufficient by the tribunal, leading to the rejection of their appeal. This case emphasizes the importance of substantiating declared values and the need for concrete evidence in customs valuation disputes to balance the interests of both the Revenue and importers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>