<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 576 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206072</link>
    <description>The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remanded to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on key issues, including the treatment of excise duty and sales tax, net exchange gain, miscellaneous receipts, and advances written off. The Tribunal also provided specific directions for the AO to verify additional evidence and apply relevant legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 576 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206072</link>
      <description>The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues remanded to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on key issues, including the treatment of excise duty and sales tax, net exchange gain, miscellaneous receipts, and advances written off. The Tribunal also provided specific directions for the AO to verify additional evidence and apply relevant legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>