https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206058 Further pre-deposit was directed in a reduced amount because the appellant had already made part-payment and the dispute was considered contentious and arguable. The Tribunal then required compliance with the revised deposit condition and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits after verifying such compliance. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of on that basis, with no merits determination made by the Tribunal itself. en-us Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206058 Further pre-deposit was directed in a reduced amount because the appellant had already made part-payment and the dispute was considered contentious and arguable. The Tribunal then required compliance with the revised deposit condition and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits after verifying such compliance. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of on that basis, with no merits determination made by the Tribunal itself. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206058