https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206044 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the yamming process did not amount to manufacture and was not liable for Service Tax as a Business Auxiliary service. The Tribunal found the revenue's arguments inconsistent and dispensed with the pre-deposit condition and penalty. Further instructions from the Commissioner were awaited for final disposal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206044 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the yamming process did not amount to manufacture and was not liable for Service Tax as a Business Auxiliary service. The Tribunal found the revenue's arguments inconsistent and dispensed with the pre-deposit condition and penalty. Further instructions from the Commissioner were awaited for final disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206044