<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 476 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206036</link>
    <description>The application for rectification of mistake regarding the date of entitlement of interest on refund was granted. The Tribunal&#039;s order dated 4-8-2010 was modified to reflect the correct date as three months after 26-5-1995. The judge emphasized that the Revenue&#039;s failure to challenge the refund claim on 29-10-1999 meant the appellants were entitled to interest on the refund. The application was allowed, and the order was amended accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 476 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206036</link>
      <description>The application for rectification of mistake regarding the date of entitlement of interest on refund was granted. The Tribunal&#039;s order dated 4-8-2010 was modified to reflect the correct date as three months after 26-5-1995. The judge emphasized that the Revenue&#039;s failure to challenge the refund claim on 29-10-1999 meant the appellants were entitled to interest on the refund. The application was allowed, and the order was amended accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>