<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 678 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat profits from the sale of shares within one year as short-term capital gains, aligning with the treatment of shares held for over a year. The decision emphasized that the intention behind share purchase should not solely rely on the holding period. The Tribunal set aside lower authorities&#039; orders, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 678 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat profits from the sale of shares within one year as short-term capital gains, aligning with the treatment of shares held for over a year. The decision emphasized that the intention behind share purchase should not solely rely on the holding period. The Tribunal set aside lower authorities&#039; orders, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowing the assessee&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>