<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 270 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner cannot retrospectively revoke common registration granted lawfully. The three units were considered part of the same factory, entitling them to exemption. The demand for duty before 7th April 2008, based on revoked registration, was deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed with consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 270 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner cannot retrospectively revoke common registration granted lawfully. The three units were considered part of the same factory, entitling them to exemption. The demand for duty before 7th April 2008, based on revoked registration, was deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed with consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>