<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 83 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206016</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to waiver of interest under the cited CBDT circulars. The petitioner&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 80 HHC was adjusted as per the retrospective amendment, and the levy of interest under Section 234B was upheld as mandatory and compensatory. The court found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments and dismissed the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 83 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206016</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner was not entitled to waiver of interest under the cited CBDT circulars. The petitioner&#039;s claim for deduction under Section 80 HHC was adjusted as per the retrospective amendment, and the levy of interest under Section 234B was upheld as mandatory and compensatory. The court found no merit in the petitioner&#039;s arguments and dismissed the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>