<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 78 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205997</link>
    <description>Revision under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act was examined in the context of whether coaching classes conducted by a chartered accountancy institution constituted a business activity requiring separate books of account and affecting exemption. The court&#039;s analysis turned on the true character of the activity: the coaching formed part of the institution&#039;s statutory function of education and training, and did not become business merely because fees were charged or study material was supplied. The revisional authority had not properly assessed the institution&#039;s nature, object, or the legal meaning of business, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that the activity was integral to the statutory objects was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 78 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205997</link>
      <description>Revision under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act was examined in the context of whether coaching classes conducted by a chartered accountancy institution constituted a business activity requiring separate books of account and affecting exemption. The court&#039;s analysis turned on the true character of the activity: the coaching formed part of the institution&#039;s statutory function of education and training, and did not become business merely because fees were charged or study material was supplied. The revisional authority had not properly assessed the institution&#039;s nature, object, or the legal meaning of business, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that the activity was integral to the statutory objects was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>