<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 675 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205992</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the civil appeal, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter to the HC for a fresh decision within four months. The HC was advised to consider imposing costs in cases of delay by the Department but to decide on merits, especially in cases with significant tax amounts involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 675 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205992</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the civil appeal, set aside the impugned order, and remitted the matter to the HC for a fresh decision within four months. The HC was advised to consider imposing costs in cases of delay by the Department but to decide on merits, especially in cases with significant tax amounts involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>