<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 288 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205982</link>
    <description>A criminal complaint under the Customs Act should not be dismissed for non-prosecution merely because of a procedural lapse in publication of process under Section 82 CrPC. The Court stated that, where such a lapse occurs, the proper course is to grant a further opportunity to comply with the procedure and, if necessary, impose costs rather than terminate the complaint abruptly. The dismissal was therefore unsustainable, and the complaint was restored to its original stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=179482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 288 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205982</link>
      <description>A criminal complaint under the Customs Act should not be dismissed for non-prosecution merely because of a procedural lapse in publication of process under Section 82 CrPC. The Court stated that, where such a lapse occurs, the proper course is to grant a further opportunity to comply with the procedure and, if necessary, impose costs rather than terminate the complaint abruptly. The dismissal was therefore unsustainable, and the complaint was restored to its original stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=205982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>